This is what I think: judgement
may not be based on emotions, whether it is pros or cons. It must be based on
evidence. In this case, Jian basically said that it was only rough sex between
consenting adults, and the three women said no, it was physical and sexual assault.
It just didn't make any common
sense that a girlfriend (not a stranger) accused Jian of assault, yet continued
to liaise with him for more sex, even sent him flowers, after the so-called
assault. The deceptive women went through collusion, lies and facts-hiding,
even teamed up and said it was time to sink the dick or kill the goose. It was
clear that they had the collective motive to destroy Jian.
The women's lack of credibility,
sincerity, honesty and seriousness only raised doubts and concerns, not helping
them win the case. They didn't tell the truth, the whole truth, nothing but the
truth. I think William Horkins, the judge, passed the correct judgement,
because the so-called assault could not be proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
Fast Edi Thoughts and
Comments
No comments:
Post a Comment