The U.S. Iran nuclear deal is seen by many as President Obama's
greatest diplomatic achievement. But there are also people who are adamantly
against it. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu calls the deal a historic
mistake. Angry war hawks and neo-con Republicans in Washington
condemn it. Obama says if Congress tries to kill the deal, he will veto the
opposition. Whether you think it is a bad deal, an average deal, or a good
deal, it looks like it is going to be a done deal.
The geopolitics in Middle East is not a simple
matter. In addition to money and power, it is further complicated by oil and
religion. Sunni and oil-rich Saudi Arabia
does not like Shite and oil-rich Iran.
Sunni and Shite Muslims have been fighting each other to this day since the
death of prophet Mohammed in 632 A.D. Arabs fight against the Jews, Persians
(Iranians) and non-Arabs. Muslims fight against the Jews and Christians.
Muslims fight against other Muslims. Netanyahu feels threatened by Iran's
building a nuclear bomb. The Israel Palestine issue remains an unresolved
conundrum. There is mess where there is oil (pun intended).The oil-rich Middle
East is a big mess!
Netanyahu's accusation of Iran
building a nuclear bomb has more to do with his own political fear than proven
fact. There is a difference between building a nuclear bomb and having the
ability to build one, not to mention that Israel
itself is a nuclear power, the only one in the Middle East.
I am not saying that Netanyahu should not be concerned about Iran's
ability to build a nuclear bomb. We should all be concerned. But it is untrue
that Iran is
actually and already building a nuclear bomb. Why does Netanyahu call this U.S.
Iran nuclear deal a historic mistake, when it addresses his very concern, to
forestall and prevent Iran
from building a nuclear bomb?
This U.S. Iran nuclear deal is the result of hard negotiation, with the
participation of Iran,
the five permanent members of the UN Security Council (U.S.A.,
U.K., France, Russia,
China) and Germany.
Are these countries all stupid? Of course not. Is it pre-mature, presumptive,
or prejudiced, for Netanyahu to call this nuclear deal made by these
definitely-not-stupid world powers a historic mistake? Why is it a historic
mistake and not a historic achievement? At the least, we must wait and see,
instead of jumping to negative conclusion.
I don't blindly take side with one country against another. I always take
side with peace. I am not against the U.S.,
Iran, Israel
or any country. I am against violence, killing and war. Those who are against
this U.S. Iran nuclear deal must tell us what the alternative is. If you don't
choose a political and diplomatic solution, then the only alternative left is
military action and war. The question is this: do you want peace, or do you want war?
Speaking as a pacifist, there is no wrong peace. Is this U.S. Iran nuclear
deal a bad deal, average deal or good deal? Since there is no wrong peace, all
peace deals are better than no peace deal at all. Peace !!!
Wednesday, July 15, 2015
The U.S. Iran Nuclear Deal
Labels:
geopolitics,
Iran,
Israel,
middle east,
Netanyahu,
nuclear bomb,
Nuclear Deal,
nuclear weapon,
obama,
oil,
Palestine.,
peace,
politics,
Saudi Arabia,
U.S.,
Uncle Sam,
United States,
USA,
war
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The majority of people are against Donald Trump's withdrawal of this U.S. Iran Nuclear Deal. I still think that a peace deal is better than no deal, but a few people like Benjamin Netanyahu and the neo-con war hawks would say that no deal is better than a bad deal. Good or bad,the fact is that a deal has been made, so please think about the meaning and consequence of the U.S. withdrawal. I don't have a feeling about it.
ReplyDeleteI don't have a good feeling about it.
DeleteI don't have a good feeling about Donald Trump's withdrawal of this deal.
ReplyDelete