More than 80% exports of Canada go to the U.S. and 70% of imports to Canada come from the U.S. Canada is never fully 'independent' politically, economically, militarily and diplomatically. Uncle Sam is the big brother neighbor of Canada.
Showing posts with label Uncle Sam. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Uncle Sam. Show all posts
Wednesday, December 8, 2021
USA, Canada and Winter Olympics 2022
When Uncle Sam blew the anti-China whistle, would Canada dare to not 'obey' and stand on the U.S.' side?
This so-called diplomatic boycott led by the US against the upcoming Winter Olympics is a political demonization and smearing against China using the same old lies, fabrication and accusation of China's failure in the US-defined human rights, freedom and democracy.
Only 20 countries at the UN followed the US' political stand against China. 173 countries supported China and the upcoming Winter Olympic Games.
So much political BS in this world ! I support all the athletes from China, Canada, the US and everywhere. Peace!
Fast Edi Thoughts and Comments *** Edi Lee for Peace
Labels:
2022,
athletes,
Canada,
China,
democracy,
fabrication,
freedom,
human rights,
lies,
Olympic Games,
smear,
smearing,
Uncle Sam,
US,
USA,
Winter Olympics
Tuesday, August 17, 2021
Uncle Sam Please Go Home
Uncle Sam is good at making wars, but to win them? Please don't ask.
The U.S. has spent 20 years and trillions of dollars in Afghanistan, and is now leaving in defeat and embarrassment. The Taliban have re-taken Kabul and the whole country. Uncle Sam can no longer be the global leader. He has lost his ability and credibility.
Do you still want to play, Uncle Sam? Do you have the money to play? By printing and creating it out of thin air? Sorry, it no longer works.
Dear American friends, please take care.
Edi Lee for Peace *** Fast Edi Thoughts and Comments
Wednesday, September 11, 2019
Hong Kong Territory
Hong Kong is an international city where East meets West, but whose territory is it? Is it a post-colonial British territory? Is it an American meddled territory? The sovereign truth is that Hong Kong is a Chinese territory. After return to Chinese rule on July 1, 1997, Hong Kong has become a Special Administrative Region (SAR) of the People's Republic of China.
___________________________________________
The so-called pro-democracy movement in Hong Kong is rather an anti-China, pro-separation movement. The ongoing protests are far from being peaceful. The protests have been very aggressive and violent, reaching the escalated levels of chaos and lawlessness. Political propaganda and fake news are everywhere. Truth has been turned to lies, lies have been turned to truth.
_________________________________________________
The big picture is that China is rising, and the U.S. is declining. Uncle Sam is using Hong Kong (and Taiwan) as a political card to play against China. The United States is losing its position of world leadership. Looks like Donald Trump is having a hard time trying to 'make America great again'.
Labels:
anti China,
chaos,
colony,
democracy,
East meets West,
Hong Kong,
independence,
international city,
lawless,
lawlessness,
protest,
riot,
separation,
Uncle Sam
Wednesday, April 19, 2017
Doctor Dao and the United Airlines
A friend in Facebook shared an article written by Andrew Lam, an author and editor of the New American Media in San Francisco. It was published by the Huffington Post on April 11, 2017 regarding David Dao, the Asian American doctor who was forcefully dragged from a United Airlines flight departing Chicago for Louisville, Kentucky.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are a few points that I agree with Andrew Lam in what he said in this article: had Dao been a blonde white woman, such assault and battery would not have happened. It was not a case of overbooking; every passenger had a seat. Rather Dao was forced to give up his paid seat to make room for United employees.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
My thoughts and comments:
Forcing a customer to give up his paid seat for the airline's own staff members was highly unfair even if it was not illegal. In any case, violence is wrong. Such incident reflects a few perceived American problems beyond the United Airlines in a broader sense: racism against non-white minorities, police brutality, an aggressive culture or violent value that 'might is right' and force is the answer to solving problems. Uncle Sam likes to fight and kill. What can we do? So bad So sad !!!
Saturday, October 31, 2015
Syria
Fooling all the people all the time no longer works. Sooner
of later, the truth will come out. If George Bush and gang of the U.S.
and Tony Blair of the U.K.
did not invade Iraq,
which was an illegal war, there would be no ISIS today.
The name of the game is to fight ISIS and the terrorists,
but the real objective of Uncle Sam is to get rid of Assad in Syria.
Putin is more open. Russia
and Syria are
long-time allies. The U.S.
looks at Assad of Syria as an evil dictator, but Russia looks at the Assad regime as the legitimate government
of Syria. The U.S. has been arming the so-called moderate rebels, but the
reality is that terrorists are terrorists, and there are very few such
so-called moderate rebels. Why do you think so many American weapons and military
gear ended up with ISIS?
Can you see the name of the game
is fighting ISIS, but the real objective of the U.S. is using the
moderate rebels, severe terrorists, or whatever you call them, to fight Assad?
On the other hand, the army of Assad is supported by Russia as the legitimate soldiers and defenders of Syria.
Anyway, it all boils down to a
competition of control and influence in Syria and the Middle
East between the U.S. and Russia. Obama and Putin just can't see eye-to-eye, and it is
very sad. The Syrian civil war is sort of like a proxy war between the U.S. and Russia, while fighting ISIS is
only a side show though still important. Uncle Sam wants to get rid of Assad,
but Putin says no, so it is like a stalemate.
Why did it take Russia's military action on ISIS in
order to wake up Obama, that there is no military solution to the Syrian civil
war, I mean for the U.S. to play a military chess game with Putin? Did Obama
pretend that he was sleeping? So now John Kerry, Secretary of State, has begun
to talk peace and take a diplomatic route, hoping to reach a political solution
with Russia. It was a bit laughable that he said having a military
alliance with Syria is a wrong strategy. Who was he talking to? Obviously Russia! Putin could easily
say to the U.S. that Russia's having a military alliance with Assad is all
legitimate, but Uncle Sam's having a military alliance with the rebels
including ISIS is the wrong strategy and illegitimate. Can you see that ISIS is
both an enemy and ally of the U.S.? It is like Uncle Sam saying "I want you, ISIS, to
help me kill Assad, but that doesn't mean I won't kill you!" Isn't that crazy or what?!
Military confrontation between
two major powers like the U.S. and Russia can only be a problem, not a solution. Obama, Putin, World Leaders: please don't let a war between the U.S. and Russia
happen! The Middle East is all a mess. Not sure when PEACE would finally come
!!!
Labels:
America,
Assad,
geopolitics,
ISIS,
John Kerry,
middle east,
military,
obama,
politics,
Putin,
Russia,
solution,
stalemate,
Syria,
U.S.,
Uncle Sam,
United States,
USA
Wednesday, October 28, 2015
NGO Spying
In the news, the Pentagon allegedly used a Christian Non Governmental Organization (NGO) as a front to spy on North Korea.
My thoughts and comments:
It is nothing new that the U.S. would use Non Governmental Organizations (NGO) to spy on other countries. When it comes to spying, no country (especially the big powers) is ever a pure angel. They are all spying devils. Today, the governments spy on both friends and foes, and everyone, even their own citizens. So this is the world we are living in today !!!
My thoughts and comments:
It is nothing new that the U.S. would use Non Governmental Organizations (NGO) to spy on other countries. When it comes to spying, no country (especially the big powers) is ever a pure angel. They are all spying devils. Today, the governments spy on both friends and foes, and everyone, even their own citizens. So this is the world we are living in today !!!
Labels:
DPRK,
government,
governments,
Korea,
NGO,
Non Governmental Organization,
North Korea,
Pentagon,
spies,
Spy,
Spying,
Uncle Sam,
United States,
US,
USA,
world
Wednesday, September 23, 2015
China - U.S. Cooperation
President Xi Jinping is visiting the U.S. China and the U.S. must
work with each other. If they fight, the whole world will suffer. If
they cooperate, which they should, good things can happen that benefit
both countries and the world.
Labels:
America,
China,
cooperate,
cooperation,
obama,
President,
Sino,
U.S.,
Uncle Sam,
United States,
USA,
Xi Jinping
Tuesday, September 15, 2015
Xi To See Obama
Chinese President Xi Jinping will pay a state visit to the United States
from Sept. 22 to 25 at the invitation of U.S. President Barack Obama. I
said this before, and now again, that China needs the U.S. and the U.S.
needs China. The world needs both. Please take the advice of Jimmy
Carter: respect each other. Please talk Peace, Protection, and
Prosperity for China, USA and the World.
Labels:
Barack Obama,
China,
Jimmy Carter,
obama,
peace,
President,
prosperity,
protection,
U.S.,
Uncle Sam,
United States,
USA,
world,
Xi Jinping
Friday, September 11, 2015
The Truth of Nine One One
Today is the 14th anniversary of 911. Do you believe the U.S. Government
told the truth, the whole truth, nothing but the truth? If you do, you
are a sheep. If you don't, you are not crazy. Do some studies. Don't be
lazy !!!
Labels:
911,
conspiracy theory,
New York,
nine one one,
September 11,
truth,
Twin Towers,
U.S.Government,
Uncle Sam,
United States,
US,
USA,
world trade center
Monday, September 7, 2015
Refugees
Refugees arriving in Munich were met by welcoming crowds.Thumbs Up to
Angela Merkel of Germany. Sorry but Thumbs Down to Stephen Harper of Canada.
Dear Prime Minister Harper, you said the root cause of the refugees was ISIS. No, please look back, way back, before ISIS came to existence. The root cause was Uncle Sam's Militarism and Interventionism, in meddling around with the affairs of other countries, including Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and more. You broke the vase, or helped break the vase, so you own it. There is no excuse not to fix it. Even if you think you did not break the vase, you must still help the refugees. Why? Many reasons, but here is one simple reason: because we are Canadians, and you are the Prime Minister of Canada.
Dear Prime Minister Harper, you said the root cause of the refugees was ISIS. No, please look back, way back, before ISIS came to existence. The root cause was Uncle Sam's Militarism and Interventionism, in meddling around with the affairs of other countries, including Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and more. You broke the vase, or helped break the vase, so you own it. There is no excuse not to fix it. Even if you think you did not break the vase, you must still help the refugees. Why? Many reasons, but here is one simple reason: because we are Canadians, and you are the Prime Minister of Canada.
Labels:
Afghanistan,
America,
Angela Merkel,
Canada,
Europe,
Germany,
interventionism,
Iraq,
ISIS,
Libya,
Militarism,
Munich,
prime minister,
refugee,
refugees,
Stephen Harper,
Uncle Sam,
United States,
US,
USA
Sunday, August 23, 2015
Korea (2)
Early this year, on January
13, 2015, I wrote about the two Koreas
showing hints that they were willing to talk, which I supported. Now North
Korea accuses South
Korea of political and military provocation
and threatens to risk an ' all out war '. The U.S.
then halts military exercise with South Korea.
Dear Uncle Sam and Korean people of the North and South,
please don't play chicken. One miscalculation could lead to irreversible
disaster. No war in the Korean Peninsula
! No war period !
A Canadian Korean friend told
me that this is the way the game is played:
North Korea under the dictatorial leadership of Kim Jong Un would
threaten to go to war with South Korea. Rich corporations of South Korea then made big donations to North Korea, which enabled them to pay less tax to the South
Korean Government. The leadership in the North got what they wanted, and the
leadership in the South stayed in power. If the US or UN would bomb North Korea, then the ' Mafia Bill ' from North Korea would be even bigger.
Money and Power Games everywhere,
only played in different ways. Peace !
Labels:
America,
DPRK,
Kim Jong Un,
Korea,
Korean Peninsula,
money,
North Korea,
politics,
power,
South Korea,
Uncle Sam,
United States,
US,
USA
Saturday, August 1, 2015
Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP)
In the news, the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) deal fails to come to an agreement.
My thoughts and comments:
The TPP is not just about economics. It also has to do with politics. It is Uncle Sam's effort trying to control and counter-balance the rise of China, especially in Asia Pacific. Does it make any sense at all, if not for politics, that the TPP does not include China, the largest country in Asia Pacific?
My thoughts and comments:
The TPP is not just about economics. It also has to do with politics. It is Uncle Sam's effort trying to control and counter-balance the rise of China, especially in Asia Pacific. Does it make any sense at all, if not for politics, that the TPP does not include China, the largest country in Asia Pacific?
Friday, July 17, 2015
Obama and Nobel Peace Prize (2)
On September 7, 2013, I wrote about Obama and the Nobel Peace Prize given to him in advance. Now that he has re-established U.S. diplomatic relationship with Cuba, and succeeded in the U.S. Iran nuclear deal, I think he
should be allowed to keep the Nobel Peace Prize. But has he fully earned
it yet, what do you think?
Wednesday, July 15, 2015
The U.S. Iran Nuclear Deal
The U.S. Iran nuclear deal is seen by many as President Obama's
greatest diplomatic achievement. But there are also people who are adamantly
against it. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu calls the deal a historic
mistake. Angry war hawks and neo-con Republicans in Washington
condemn it. Obama says if Congress tries to kill the deal, he will veto the
opposition. Whether you think it is a bad deal, an average deal, or a good
deal, it looks like it is going to be a done deal.
The geopolitics in Middle East is not a simple matter. In addition to money and power, it is further complicated by oil and religion. Sunni and oil-rich Saudi Arabia does not like Shite and oil-rich Iran. Sunni and Shite Muslims have been fighting each other to this day since the death of prophet Mohammed in 632 A.D. Arabs fight against the Jews, Persians (Iranians) and non-Arabs. Muslims fight against the Jews and Christians. Muslims fight against other Muslims. Netanyahu feels threatened by Iran's building a nuclear bomb. The Israel Palestine issue remains an unresolved conundrum. There is mess where there is oil (pun intended).The oil-rich Middle East is a big mess!
Netanyahu's accusation of Iran building a nuclear bomb has more to do with his own political fear than proven fact. There is a difference between building a nuclear bomb and having the ability to build one, not to mention that Israel itself is a nuclear power, the only one in the Middle East.
I am not saying that Netanyahu should not be concerned about Iran's ability to build a nuclear bomb. We should all be concerned. But it is untrue that Iran is actually and already building a nuclear bomb. Why does Netanyahu call this U.S. Iran nuclear deal a historic mistake, when it addresses his very concern, to forestall and prevent Iran from building a nuclear bomb?
This U.S. Iran nuclear deal is the result of hard negotiation, with the participation of Iran, the five permanent members of the UN Security Council (U.S.A., U.K., France, Russia, China) and Germany. Are these countries all stupid? Of course not. Is it pre-mature, presumptive, or prejudiced, for Netanyahu to call this nuclear deal made by these definitely-not-stupid world powers a historic mistake? Why is it a historic mistake and not a historic achievement? At the least, we must wait and see, instead of jumping to negative conclusion.
I don't blindly take side with one country against another. I always take side with peace. I am not against the U.S., Iran, Israel or any country. I am against violence, killing and war. Those who are against this U.S. Iran nuclear deal must tell us what the alternative is. If you don't choose a political and diplomatic solution, then the only alternative left is military action and war. The question is this: do you want peace, or do you want war?
Speaking as a pacifist, there is no wrong peace. Is this U.S. Iran nuclear deal a bad deal, average deal or good deal? Since there is no wrong peace, all peace deals are better than no peace deal at all. Peace !!!
The geopolitics in Middle East is not a simple matter. In addition to money and power, it is further complicated by oil and religion. Sunni and oil-rich Saudi Arabia does not like Shite and oil-rich Iran. Sunni and Shite Muslims have been fighting each other to this day since the death of prophet Mohammed in 632 A.D. Arabs fight against the Jews, Persians (Iranians) and non-Arabs. Muslims fight against the Jews and Christians. Muslims fight against other Muslims. Netanyahu feels threatened by Iran's building a nuclear bomb. The Israel Palestine issue remains an unresolved conundrum. There is mess where there is oil (pun intended).The oil-rich Middle East is a big mess!
Netanyahu's accusation of Iran building a nuclear bomb has more to do with his own political fear than proven fact. There is a difference between building a nuclear bomb and having the ability to build one, not to mention that Israel itself is a nuclear power, the only one in the Middle East.
I am not saying that Netanyahu should not be concerned about Iran's ability to build a nuclear bomb. We should all be concerned. But it is untrue that Iran is actually and already building a nuclear bomb. Why does Netanyahu call this U.S. Iran nuclear deal a historic mistake, when it addresses his very concern, to forestall and prevent Iran from building a nuclear bomb?
This U.S. Iran nuclear deal is the result of hard negotiation, with the participation of Iran, the five permanent members of the UN Security Council (U.S.A., U.K., France, Russia, China) and Germany. Are these countries all stupid? Of course not. Is it pre-mature, presumptive, or prejudiced, for Netanyahu to call this nuclear deal made by these definitely-not-stupid world powers a historic mistake? Why is it a historic mistake and not a historic achievement? At the least, we must wait and see, instead of jumping to negative conclusion.
I don't blindly take side with one country against another. I always take side with peace. I am not against the U.S., Iran, Israel or any country. I am against violence, killing and war. Those who are against this U.S. Iran nuclear deal must tell us what the alternative is. If you don't choose a political and diplomatic solution, then the only alternative left is military action and war. The question is this: do you want peace, or do you want war?
Speaking as a pacifist, there is no wrong peace. Is this U.S. Iran nuclear deal a bad deal, average deal or good deal? Since there is no wrong peace, all peace deals are better than no peace deal at all. Peace !!!
Labels:
geopolitics,
Iran,
Israel,
middle east,
Netanyahu,
nuclear bomb,
Nuclear Deal,
nuclear weapon,
obama,
oil,
Palestine.,
peace,
politics,
Saudi Arabia,
U.S.,
Uncle Sam,
United States,
USA,
war
Saturday, July 11, 2015
Donald Trump For U.S. President ?
Just finished watching a Youtube video titled 'Exclusive Donald Trump Interview: I Love China / msnbc'.
Here are my thoughts and comments: .
I have mixed feelings about Donald Trump. He is a shameless self-promoter, and yes, with a huge ego and narcissistic personality. He talks like he is the smartest and richest person in the world, but he is not.Yet, when it comes to business and economics, he does know what he is talking about. He is very blunt and to the point, and tells you as it is, with no sensitivity or apology whatsoever.
I doubt Donald Trump really loves China, but I think he sort of respects China as a great challenger or competitor. There is a Chinese saying which goes like this, " A hero respects another hero". At the present, China is playing the game of capitalism (the Chinese way) very well, even better than capitalistic America. Donald Trump is not wrong in saying that the U.S. needs better and tougher negotiators to deal with China.
Competition is not necessarily a bad thing, as long as it is a fair game, and that it benefits one's country and people, and better still, it also benefits other countries and people.We need world leaders who are able to solve problems and improve the lives of the people of their countries "and" other countries, all by peaceful means. No violence, no killing, no war. Negotiation is fine. Fair competition is fine. Would Donald Trump make a good U.S. President? I don't know. What do you think ?
Here are my thoughts and comments: .
I have mixed feelings about Donald Trump. He is a shameless self-promoter, and yes, with a huge ego and narcissistic personality. He talks like he is the smartest and richest person in the world, but he is not.Yet, when it comes to business and economics, he does know what he is talking about. He is very blunt and to the point, and tells you as it is, with no sensitivity or apology whatsoever.
I doubt Donald Trump really loves China, but I think he sort of respects China as a great challenger or competitor. There is a Chinese saying which goes like this, " A hero respects another hero". At the present, China is playing the game of capitalism (the Chinese way) very well, even better than capitalistic America. Donald Trump is not wrong in saying that the U.S. needs better and tougher negotiators to deal with China.
Competition is not necessarily a bad thing, as long as it is a fair game, and that it benefits one's country and people, and better still, it also benefits other countries and people.We need world leaders who are able to solve problems and improve the lives of the people of their countries "and" other countries, all by peaceful means. No violence, no killing, no war. Negotiation is fine. Fair competition is fine. Would Donald Trump make a good U.S. President? I don't know. What do you think ?
Labels:
America,
business,
China,
competition,
competitor. USA,
Donald Trump,
economics,
economy,
politics,
presidency,
President,
Trade,
U.S.,
Uncle Sam,
United States
Thursday, July 2, 2015
Good Guys and Bad Guys in World Politics
Just finished watching a Youtube video of Lada Ray titled
'Putin's Gambit: Germany To Replace
Ukraine As Russian Gas Transiter'.
Here are my thoughts and comments:
Lada Ray is a good political analyst and commentator.
Sometimes she talks beyond the mundane. Her comments in this video and others
tell me that she see things well from the Russian perspective. I agree with her
that Putin is a great chess player. Of course, Uncle Sam depicts Russia
as the bad and isolated guy. The truth is that Russia
is not isolated. As to who are the good guys and who are the bad guys, please
study, observe and decide for yourself.
In diplomacy, there are no bad
guys. In war, you are the good guy and your enemy is the bad guy. In politics,
the good guys and the bad guys are the same guys. An angel blinks his eyes and
becomes a devil. A devil snaps his fingers and becomes an angel. Politicians
are neither good nor bad. Politicians are politicians.
If you are interested in oil and
pipeline politics, watch this video. It is about 21 minutes long. I feel sorry
for the people in Ukraine. However you look at the situation in Ukraine, it is a loser, not a winner. Ukraine is not a good chess player. It is not even a player. It
is the chess.
Ukraine is a chess game played by the two major players, the U.S. and Russia. Some NATO countries like Germany and France take side with the U.S. against Russia for external show, but work with Russia not-so-openly for their self interests. Peace!
Thursday, June 25, 2015
The U.S. and China Must Talk
The U.S. and China must talk. They must maintain and improve their
major-power relationship through peaceful means.
The U.S. needs China. China needs the U.S. The world needs both. I like Jimmy Carter's advice: the U.S. must respect China, and vice versa. Peace !!!
The U.S. needs China. China needs the U.S. The world needs both. I like Jimmy Carter's advice: the U.S. must respect China, and vice versa. Peace !!!
Tuesday, June 16, 2015
Is Japan Giving Up Pacifism ?
In the news, 25,000 Japanese protesters in Toyko opposed war
legislation put forward by their Prime Minister Shinzo Abe.
These are my thoughts and comments:
To allow Japan
to give up Pacifism and re-militarize itself is a terrible mistake. Japan's
war crimes and atrocities against China
and other Asian and non-Asian countries still have not been settled. Don't know
what political and military game that Abe is playing.
Regarding Japan's
war crimes and atrocities committed against China
in the Second World War, Japan
still has not issued a formal apology to China.
Instead, Abe just said to the U.S. Congress that "History is harsh. What
was done cannot be undone." What an irresponsible statement and B.S. it
was !
When I went to university in the U.S.,
I had a Japanese schoolmate Yoshi who talked candidly about these things with
me, including Japan's
invasion and occupying of China,
the Nanjing Massacre, Sex Slaves, and so many war crimes and atrocities. Yoshi
said these words to me, " I sincerely apologize to China
for Japan."
Whao, how I wish Yoshi became the Prime Minister of Japan,
not Shinzo Abe.
If Japan
or other Asian countries think that the U.S.
will always take side with them to fight China,
they are making a terrible mistake. China
wants peace, not war, but China
will never be humiliated by Japan
ever again. It is unlikely that the U.S.
will go to war with China
or Russia. If
it did, a nuclear war would break out, and the whole world would be finished.
Uncle Sam also makes a terrible
mistake, if he thinks that NATO members will always "obey" him 100%.
If the U.S. goes
to war with Russia,
I bet Germany
and France will
not follow, in spite of NATO's so-called principle of "If you attack one,
you attack all". Does this remind you of George Bush's stupid statement
that "you are either on our side, or you are on the terrorist's
side!" ?
At the end of the day, each
country would be most concerned with its own well being and success, and would
not blindly take action solely based on its membership or affiliation with whatever
organization or alliance it belongs to. I mean when the shit hit the fan, it is
not impossible that ideology and membership would yield to unexpected action
rather based on rationality, reality and practicality.
I dare to say that the whole Asia,
including Japan,
is already substantially anchored with and influenced by China's
growing economy. To put it bluntly, if you are an Asian country located in Asia,
would you join the increasingly prosperous and powerful China Club nearby, or the
debt-ridden and declining American Club thousands of miles away?
China
is not a new rising power. It is a re-emerging power. Except for the last 200
years or so, China
has always been the super power of the world. When I attended university in the
U.S., an
American History Professor told me that the 19th century belongs to the British
Empire, the 20th century belongs to the United
States of America, and the 21st century
belongs to China.
Looks like he is right.
Dear Mr. Abe, please listen to
your own peace-loving Japanese protesters. Even Uncle Sam is showing signs of
being tired of repeated war games, and you think that by re-militarizing Japan,
you can again invade and fight China?
Labels:
Abe,
America,
apology,
Asia,
China,
George Bush,
Japan,
militarization,
military,
NATO,
Pacific,
Pacifism,
re-militarization,
Shinzo Abe,
U.S.,
U.S.A.,
Uncle Sam,
United States,
war,
Yoshi
Friday, May 8, 2015
Omar Khadr versus Stephen Harper
Omar Khadr is free on bail. Thumbs up to his lawyer Dennis
Edney ! The argument of Stephen Harper's Government that setting Omar free
would hurt U.S. and Canada relation has been rejected by the Court.
Examples are plenty, that Stephen Harper's get-tough-approach
didn't seem to respect and care about Canada's
constitution and judicial system, international laws, and the UN Charter.
Our prime minister seems to be just following, copying, obeying and taking
orders from Uncle Sam. He seems to have been Americanizing and militarizing Canada.
He has made Canada join the American Fighting and Killing Club, whose war hawk leaders seem
to have a never ending agenda for fighting, killing and wars. Canada
under Stephen Harper's rule is not the same Canada
of peace and peacekeeping that we used to know. Sometimes I wonder if Stephen
Harper is a closet dictator and would-be war hawk, or what ?
In the case of Omar Khadr, Stephen Harper's approach is typically an
American macho-man approach, with little Canadian compassion and sensitivity. Omar
was a child soldier. He was only 15 years old when he allegedly killed an
American soldier in Afghanistan.
Even if he did kill an American soldier, he was still only a child. He
was labelled as a terrorist and illegal combatant by Uncle Sam, and certainly
Stephen Harper concurred.
This case of Omar Khadr smells strongly American, not
Canadian. Stephen Harper had chosen not to seek extradition or repatriation,
despite the urging of Amnesty International, UNICEF, the Canadian Bar
Association, the Federal Court of Canada and other prominent organizations.
What does this tell you about Stephen Harper and his not-so-Canadian way of
treating Omar? Did all these respectable recommendations matter to him at all? Was
pleasing Uncle Sam more important than everything else?
Omar's lawyer Dennis Edney accused Stephen Harper of being a bigot, but I
won't go that far. However, I do feel that under Harper's Government, it seems
that Canada no
longer treats its citizens equally. In a few cases, Stephen Harper seemed to be
biased and selective, in deciding which Canadian citizens to protect, and which
just to ignore, when they got into troubles in foreign lands and needed help.
There are 2 undeniable facts about the case of Omar Khadr: (1) Omar was a 15 years old child soldier. Calling him a terrorist or illegal
combatant did not change the fact that he was only a minor at the time, and (2)
Guantanamo Detention Center in Cuba was the hell hole and military
base outside the legal system of Uncle Sam, where Omar was imprisoned, tortured
and grew up.
Regarding democracy, freedom, human rights and international laws,
Guantanamo is a shame of Uncle Sam.
Didn't Obama promise he would close it down in his first year of presidency ? ( please
read my blog of Dec.16, 2013 titled Guantanamo Prison ). Omar said the plea
agreement that he signed was completely created by the U.S. Government, and
that he signed it only to escape the continued abuse and torture at Guantanamo
Bay.
This case of Omar Khadr is not over yet. The story goes on,
hopefully with positive development, and not with any more political
interference.
Labels:
Afghanistan,
Canada,
constitution,
Dennis Edney,
Guantamo,
judicial system,
law,
Omar Khadr,
politics,
soldier,
Stephen Harper,
Terrorism,
terrorist,
U.S.,
Uncle Sam,
United States,
USA,
war
Wednesday, April 15, 2015
Do Good Competition In Yemen
Propaganda by Countries is nothing new. It is part of domestic and
international politics. However, I love to see 'positive' propaganda
based on facts, such as world leaders taking real actions to do good and make peace
rather than going to war.
I have watched some news videos in Youtube regarding the current situation in Yemen.Two videos stand out, which show the different response of the Chinese and U.S. Governments:
One video shows that China helped evacuate hundreds of nationals of 10 different countries from Yemen, mostly Pakistanis and other nationals, including those of the U.K., Italy, Ireland, Singapore, Germany and Canada.
On the other hand, the other video shows that the U.S.Government was being sued for failing to save Americans in Yemen during Saudi airstrikes.Would you be mad if you or your loved ones were American citizens and got stuck in Yemen, and that your own U.S. Government, which was able to help, but failed to bring you or your loved ones out from a war zone to safety?
In the Do Good Competition, the U.S. lost to China on this one, because it didn't even care about its own citizens, while China helped its own citizens as well as citizens of other countries. I feel a bit sad, because I want to see BOTH China and U.S.A. become great leaders of the world, in healthy competition and peaceful cooperation, but not to screw each other.
This evacuation comparison in Yemen confirms that China is indeed rising as a world leader, while the U.S. is in decline. China's rise is a certainty, but the U.S. decline is not. Instead of setting road blocks and preventing China from rising, I think Uncle Sam should make real efforts to overcome his own problems and recapture its past greatness. There is nothing wrong for the world to grant a Do Good gold medal to 2 champions, even 3, 4, 5 or more. At this time, it appears that China is winning
I have watched some news videos in Youtube regarding the current situation in Yemen.Two videos stand out, which show the different response of the Chinese and U.S. Governments:
One video shows that China helped evacuate hundreds of nationals of 10 different countries from Yemen, mostly Pakistanis and other nationals, including those of the U.K., Italy, Ireland, Singapore, Germany and Canada.
On the other hand, the other video shows that the U.S.Government was being sued for failing to save Americans in Yemen during Saudi airstrikes.Would you be mad if you or your loved ones were American citizens and got stuck in Yemen, and that your own U.S. Government, which was able to help, but failed to bring you or your loved ones out from a war zone to safety?
In the Do Good Competition, the U.S. lost to China on this one, because it didn't even care about its own citizens, while China helped its own citizens as well as citizens of other countries. I feel a bit sad, because I want to see BOTH China and U.S.A. become great leaders of the world, in healthy competition and peaceful cooperation, but not to screw each other.
This evacuation comparison in Yemen confirms that China is indeed rising as a world leader, while the U.S. is in decline. China's rise is a certainty, but the U.S. decline is not. Instead of setting road blocks and preventing China from rising, I think Uncle Sam should make real efforts to overcome his own problems and recapture its past greatness. There is nothing wrong for the world to grant a Do Good gold medal to 2 champions, even 3, 4, 5 or more. At this time, it appears that China is winning
Labels:
America,
China,
citizen,
citizens,
competition,
cooperation,
Do Good,
evacuate,
evacuation,
leader,
nationality,
nationals,
peace,
U.S.,
Uncle Sam,
USA,
war,
world,
Yemen
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)